Topical brief comment: Greta


As parents we guide our children because they are new to the world and don't know how to live in it safely, or make decisions that will be in their best interests. What age does this process stop? At what age do we decide that our children have full moral responsibility to have sex, drink alcohol, vote, drive a car, leave home? In most countries these ages would range from 18 to 21. So why would anyone think that children in their early and mid teens have the ability and responsibility to make decisions about environmental and economic policy? Why do adults listen in rapt awe to Greta Thunberg, and encourage their children to take part in climate change protests when they want them home before 10 pm? If you think your child is old enough to determine national policy, then they are old enough to take part in all other adult activities. Otherwise they are just being used and manipulated as emotive puppets. 

Harry

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Image
Making the Most Out of Other People’s Misery This is Sam McGlennon. Lets’ face it, he looks like a nice guy: honest, decent, well educated, undoubtedly with good intentions. Maybe that’s how he managed to land the ideal job. He describes himself as a “ climate risk and resilience advisor, as well as a sustainable supply chain expert, for NZ businesses and governments”. Sounds very cool, very now. I mean, advising governments , plural. Wow. Of course this might not be a real job. I mean, I write stuff, and it’s just possible that people from businesses and governments read it, so I guess I could say I advise businesses and governments. But cynicism aside, the best part of Sam’s job, what makes it ideal, is that he gets to take smug satisfaction out of the misery of millions of people who have lost their jobs and whose businesses have gone bust. How cool is that! You see Sam is a New Zealand greenie, but he represents the views of many environmentalists around the wo
Read more
Just When You Thought Greta Thunberg Ruled the World, a Voice of Reason Joe Nalven, a former associate director of the Institute for Regional Studies of the Californias at San Diego State University, writing in the Times of San Diego , takes a careful, measured look at the climate change debate, and argues for the unpopular idea that both sides need to continue to be heard if we are to take effective action. Read more.
Read more
Image
  Yet Another Good Reason for Cancelling Robots As posted on Breitbart: "Facebook users who watched a video from a British newspaper showing black men received an automated prompt from the social media platform  asking  if they wanted to “keep seeing videos about Primates,” according to the  New York Times. " This embarrassing incident just shows how completely inept artificial intelligence is, yet it's rapidly taking over the world, in everything from internet searches to approving bank loans. "Down with the robots", I say. Isaac Asimov saw all this coming back in the 1940s, and Dr Smith had the right idea in the 1960s.  Read more . Harry Wiren
Read more